COULD OBAMACARE BE HEADED BACK TO THE SUPREME COURT

10/26/12
Matthew Staver, the Founder and Dean of the Liberty University School of Law filed one of the first private lawsuits against the new Act. Though the University’s lawsuit has been held up by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals which argued that the Anti-Injunction Act prevented the court hearing the merits of the case, that barrier was torn down by the June Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare. The Supreme Court ordered the Department of Justice to respond to Liberty University’s suit. That means the Justices are taking very seriously the Liberty charge that both individuals and employers are being FORCED to directly fund abortion, a clear infringement upon the freedom of religious expression.
Nestled within the ‘individual mandate’ in the Act—that portion of the Act requiring every American to purchase government-approved insurance or pay a penalty—is an ‘abortion premium mandate’. ” As Staver puts it, ObamaCare, via extraordinarily secretive rules issued on March 15th, 2012 by Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius, “funds [abortion] in two ways.”
“First [of] all, for the individual, for the first time in history, it requires each individual to pay a particular fee and that goes directly into an abortion fund and that fund funds abortion. This fee doesn’t go into a general fund, some of which funds other surgeries or medical treatment, some of which might fund abortion. No, this goes into a specific fund that funds abortion. (It’s the) very first time in history you can trace the dollar to the actual abortion.”
Employers–even those associated with religious institutions—will also be forced by federal law to fund abortions. HHS rules] forbid the plan from calling attention to that fact in any of its advertising or explanatory materials.” (2) As National Right to Life puts it, “this provision seems designed for no other purpose than to ensure that many people who would not deliberately sign up for abortion-covering plans will do so inadvertently, because of the federally enforced gag rule.” In deciding which cases will be heard by the Supreme Court, the “Rule of Four” applies. That is, if 4 justices agree a case should be heard, a writ of certiorari will be issued to the petitioner and the case will be placed on the court’s docket. It would not be surprising that these 4 should call ObamaCare back before the Court during the new term.
Source—coach Collins, matthew staver, doug book

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s