The Democratic Party and Karl Marx

New York Senator Chuck Schumer thinks that it is a good thing, an affirmation of “family values” and “freedom,” that nearly 3 million people are expected to stop working in order to be able to qualify for Obamacare subsidies.
While on “Meet the Press” this past weekend, Schumer was blunt: The “bottom line,” he said, “is very simple. What [the] CBO [Congressional Budget Office] said is that many American workers would have freedom. That Americans would now have the “freedom to do things that they couldn’t [previously] do.” That Obamacare promises to discourage people from looking for work is also a boost for “family values.” Schumer explained: “The single mom who’s raising three kids [and] has to keep a job because of healthcare, can now spend some time raising those kids. That’s a family value.”
That Schumer and Obama may not subscribe to Marx’s “dialectical materialism,” say, is neither here nor there. The fact is that, like Marx, leftist Democrats are convinced that “capitalism,” i.e. the private sector, “alienates” workers from their “labor.” Marx contrasted “the human world” with “the world of things.” He writes: “The devaluation of the human world increases in direct relation with the increase in value of the world of things” A worker’s labor reduces the worker to “a commodity [.]”
That is, workers are related to their work “as to an alien object” (emphasis original). What this means is that the laborer “becomes a slave of the object,” the “thing” or the “commodity,” that he produces. “The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force,” “an autonomous power” that now “exists independently” of its author.
Marx’s idea seems to be something like this: Human beings produce goods in exchange for the wages of their labor. This, though, results in the human becoming dependent upon the fruits of his labor, for his need for “subsistence” demands that he continue producing. The creature now stands over and above the creator. But it isn’t just the product of his labor to which the laborer is now enslaved: he is enslaved as well to his labor itself.
Since a person who works is related to “his own activity as something alien and not belonging to him,” his “activity” becomes “suffering (passivity),” his “strength” is rendered “powerlessness,” and his “creation” is his “emasculation [.]” In other words, “the personal physical and mental energy of the worker, his personal life,” is “an activity which is directed against himself, independent of him and not belonging to him.” “Man becomes alienated from other men.” Schumer, Obama, and all leftist Democrats who claim to think that Americans’ emancipation from work is some kind of historical achievement believe what they say.
Private property is both cause and effect of the misery, the “alienation,” brought about by work They are of one mind with Marx when the latter laments how private property, being both “the product of alienate labor” and “the means by which labor is alienated,” “has made us so stupid and partial.

Sources—jack kerwick, one political plaza, frontpage mag.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s